View results

Nominations: Nominations closed

Voting: Voting closed

Vacancies
2
Results
Re-open nominations is a winner
No
Count information
Date count run17 Mar 2023
Election rulesERS97 STV
Candidates running3
Available positions2
Total ballots10
Valid votes10
Invalid votes0
Round 1
Eileen Bei Zeng [12210]3.00
Manaal Tariq [13215]7.00
RON (Re-open Nominations)0.00
Exhausted0.00
Surplus3.66
Threshold3.33
Count of first choices. The initial quota is 3.34. Candidate Manaal Tariq [13215] has reached the threshold and is elected. Candidates have surplus votes so surplus votes will be transferred for the next round.
Round 2
Eileen Bei Zeng [12210]6.64
Manaal Tariq [13215]3.34
RON (Re-open Nominations)0.00
Exhausted0.02
Surplus3.30
Threshold3.32
Count after transferring surplus votes from Manaal Tariq [13215]. Candidate Eileen Bei Zeng [12210] has reached the threshold and is elected.

Winners are Eileen Bei Zeng [12210] and Manaal Tariq [13215].

Candidates

Eileen Bei Zeng

Hi everyone! As a second year LLB law student with a deep interest in bioethics, medicine and healthcare, I want to be able to provide opportunities for students with all other backgrounds to understand this field better and key questions like why we should respect patients' autonomy. I noticed that there have not been as many events or speakers on the topic of medical law this year, so it would be my priority to help organise meaningful events, discussion groups and networking opportunities for aspiring med law students, life sciences students, and simply anyone who is interested! 

I have experience in contacting firms and taking lead of a group from my summer internship with Green Enterprise Group and will be able to apply that in benefitting BMLSoc to the best of my ability. Overall, I am so excited to bring all of you closer to the field of medical law and learn how relevant yet fascinating it really is. Thank you and I hope you will consider voting for me!

Manaal Tariq

Medical Law is an intriguing and essential branch of law in the technologically fluid and medically advanced world that we are a part of. From euthanasia, DNR’s, testing confidentiality to end of life treatment, there can be endless intricate topics to discuss. 

As the Medical Law Chair, I would network with doctors, professionals, lawyers, companies, and individuals who have had experiences in the field and are willing to share it with students across the board. These discussions would not only prove stimulating but also imperative to students as it would highlight an on-paper issue and give us an idea of what ethical dilemmas really look like in reality.  

I think I can contribute as the Medical Law Chair because my interests lie at the intersection of both these fields. The job requires me to communicate confidently, stay informed of global issues, and take action, all of which I believe I can do.  

Here are a few ideas I want to implement: 

  • Simulating ethical misconduct cases in real-time and looking at conducting a medical law trial event.  

  • Events to network with professionals working in this sector.  

  • Debates to perform policy reviews. 

  • Organising talks on intriguing and important topics.